image

October 26, 2011

Open Source Drugs

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — admin @ 6:56 pm

Once I have made enough money with my current venture, I want to try to open a foundation for open source drug research. It will be based on the following things:

  • Fundraisers (e.g. walkathons) for various diseases
  • People can contribute prize money at any time
  • Prizes offered to researchers who submit a breakthrough in an area people have funded. Hopefully they will become prestigious.
  • These prizes will be in the millions of dollars. But they will be given out in stages as the drug goes through stages: research results, human trials, distribution. Some of the prize money will come from certifying of distribution companies for a minimal cost, etc.
  • Labs, human trials, distribution companies, can all be standardized and funded by the foundation. But the R&D has to be incentivized with prizes.
  • Any research submitted his way will be OPEN SOURCED to everyone. Meaning, patents will be granted such that anyone can freely use this information provided that if anyone who gets a patent based on them, they must also release their findings under the same “patentleft” license.
  • I believe that large companies which reap the benefits of our research will start giving money to the foundation in order to spur open source drug research, similarly to how Google and Apple give money to Mozilla and Apache Foundation etc.
  • Companies will compete on distribution, brand names, etc. But the underlying information and results of the R&D will be available to all.
  • People should be able to fund things in stages, ahead of time, based on what they need.
  • Universities will be able to align themselves with free information and build prestigious names for themselves, similarly to how Nobel Prize winners can improve the reputation of the university that employed them.

Visit this link to learn more about patentleft: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patentleft

Open source was originally modeled on scientific research. I want to bring the economics of biotech back to what they are in the scientific research domain, where scientists can build on each other’s work and peer-review it. How come people in the physics department can built on each other’s work, but biotech researchers are snapped up?

There is one area where this would be different than the patent system. Under the patent / copyrightgovernment monopoly system (affectionately referred to by many as “intellectual property”), funding can be granted either by a committee or by a rich individual or entity which was convinced that they may turn a profit. This is the way funding is obtained for movies, etc. The danger with the “free information” system may come from mistakes made by a committee. How do we know which drugs or movies will succeed if the funding comes from the public, and a committee has to pick winners? We don’t.

In the “intellectual property” scenario, those who fund a new movie or drug may often be taking a long-shot, unpopular speculative position. Also it is usually “all or nothing” — either the movie and drug is a hit and they make a profit, or it’s a bust and they lose their money.

In the “free information” scenario, we break the prizes down into stages, so it’s not all or nothing. A researcher can still get funding from a private entity and split the prize with them. Maybe their drug doesn’t pass human trials and then they don’t get the larger prize, but their work is now in the public domain and someone else can build on it. Anyway, prizes are awarded when a drug goes to the next stage — human trials. I predict that the biggest problem will lie in the gatekeepers who will promote things to the next stage, i.e. awarding prizes. So his should be composed of a group of foremost experts in that field, who I think would be excited to evaluate the latest research (it’s FREE INFORMATION) and award what would be a very prestigious prize. Unlike the low-paid, nameless patent examiners, being on this committee would be a prestigious thing since our goal would be to attract the leaders in each field to vet new discoveries for promotion to the next stage. It would be a privilege to get the prize, too. Submissions for prizes may cost $10,000 each or require support from peers to discourage frivolous submissions and overwhelming the committees with a glut of submissions.

I personally think this system should be much more efficient in the long term at advancing the state of the art, and producing things that people actually want, just as open Free and Open Source software has eventually supplanted proprietary solutions (e.g. Firefox, Chrome vs IE). The economics are that big companies are now funding the free software foundations, because of all the wealth being created by them.

On the other hand, patents are getting more useless with time as a way to promote the state of the art, because as the industry accelerates, they build up and increase the cost of new innovations. Similarly with copyright where derivative works cannot be created for almost hundred years without consent of the copyright holder, but we are talking more about utilitarian contribution to society. But even so, in both copyright and patents, we should have a force to balance the greedy, proprietary systems that have arisen on the back of this government protection. We don’t want to take away patents, but start to counteract them with Free Information. Companies may grind their teeth at their inability to make profits off the information financed by the public (as they do now with the walkathons etc.) but after a while the people shall take their information back and everyone will have the freedom to make use of any idea in the portfolio of Free Patents.

Basically I want to make a Free Information alternative to patents when I have the money to do so. It would be a huge undertaking, but, I think, a very rewarding one. What do you all think? :)

Greg

May 5, 2011

Where I stand on the Atheism / Judaism issue

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — admin @ 3:03 pm

When I grew up, I believed that faith was enough of a reason to believe something, and that mere skepticism (”you have no reason to believe that”) was not enough to get anyone to lose their faith. Since then, I have come a long way.

First of all, I realized that there was evidence from lots of sciences and history going against the Biblical story. Indeed, the Bible made falsifiable claims, and they seemed to have been falsified. For example, the global flood — which pretty much all orthodox Jews and the Talmud believe happened literally — also must have happened around 2104, but this contradicts Egyptian history, as well as other things. So, studying science causes one to have serious doubts about Judaism, and in fact all Abrahamic religions. Even if you had faith, then, you would have difficulty reconciling what you believe with what people who are aware of science, history etc. believe about the world.

For a while I thought this all but proved religion was untrue. Judaism, Christianity, these were the main religions under consideration for me. If entire chapters of their books described what seemed to be fictional events, that couldn’t be compatible with the claim that an All-Knowing God, a God of Truth would dictate these entire chapters and stories to the Jews. Case closed, I thought. I would continue to observe certain major commandments on the chance that I was wrong, but meanwhile I would question rabbis and Christians and see, how could I be wrong? How do they deal with this? I have encountered lots of guesses and incomplete answers, but no one seems to know.

It was harder to come up with evidence for the other side, but eventually that came together as well. And this is what I want to tell you about.

JUDAISM IS UNIQUE

First of all, Judaism is extremely unique. It is the only religion which does not have the “major problem” every other religion has: that the religion itself says it was started by one or a few people. If no one in the religion has seen the founding events, except a few people, one can only have so much rational belief that the natural order was suspended. Christianity started with a few apostles, and Paul claimed he saw Jesus on the road to Damascus. Muhammad claimed he heard God’s revelation — not to everyone, but to him. So far as I know (and I have been checking a lot, as have other people), Judaism is the only religion that claims to have started with roughly 3 million people who were direct ancestors of the Israelites. (600k males.) Now, this would give a lot of credibility to the religion, because it’s extremely hard to get this kind of thing started. You can imagine a religion like Scientology or Christianity or Islam getting started with a few people claiming stuff that didn’t REALLY happen. And indeed, all these religions continue to preserve the story of how they started — and it was with a few people. But once you have a religion where people say God spoke to ALL THE ANCESTORS, and that ALL THE ANCESTORS wandered for 40 years in the desert, it’s very hard to come up with a plausible explanation for how this happened. Try it yourself.

The above is called the Kuzari argument, and is argued very well by Lawrence Kelemen here: http://www.simpletoremember.com/articles/a/proof-torah-true/ . Dr. Dovid Gottlieb, a famous rabbi with a Ph. D in logic, penned a book leading everyone through the argument of why Judaism alone is unique: http://ohr.edu/992 .

Here are the really powerful parts:

1) Out of all the different religions in the world that we know about, past and present, we do not find any other group of people that believed ALL THEIR ANCESTORS witnessed the founding event of their religion: a supernatural deity speaking to them. This would give a religion a lot of credibility, but precisely because it would be hard to start a conspiracy — anyone could sell you out easily, and one can argue that that’s why no fake attempt has ever taken off. The only way it could have been accepted was if it’s true.

2) Jewish people religiously (no pun intended) follow a set of laws all about the God that spoke to ALL THEIR ANCESTORS. The law concerns every part of their lives, including seemingly insane things like: NO ONE in the country planting for a whole year, because they supposedly saw God give twice the harvest the previous year; or ALL the men leaving all the women and children at the borders to go worship at the temple, because they believed God’s promise that Israel won’t be attacked at this time. Jews took these laws seriously, but why would they do that unless they already believed that God gave them this law at mount Sinai? It would be hard to introduce a written book where the story is recorded once and for all, and then get everyone to accept it even though no one has ever heard of anything like this, and then make them follow the very counterintuitive laws in the book.

3) If this was a NATURAL thing, and explained through natural causes, how come it never happened again? The main principle of history is that history repeats itself. The main tool of science is repeatable experiments. Out of all the religions of the world, this was never repeated.

This last one is the key to the uniqueness I am talking about. I am not saying Judaism is unique in the sense that “everyone is unique in their own way.” It is unique in the exact way that makes every other religion questionable: it doesn’t claim to start with a few people spreading the word! Here is the strangest part:

4) The Torah itself calls this out! The book of Deuteronomy issues this challenge as proof that Jews should know Judaism is true, and to this day, the challenge has remained unanswered. Everyone had a chance to do this, but they didn’t.

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+4%3A32-40&version=NIV

THE JEWISH PEOPLE ARE UNIQUE

Out of all the nations that existed 2000 years ago and before, there are very few that are left. One might put China and India in these categories — countries with huge populations and lots of land. But there has only been one nation that survived in the Western world, despite persecutions, despite being kicked out of their land, despite living among other people all around the world, and despite the efforts of a lot of nations to convert, integrate, or otherwise get rid of the Jewish nation. The only things they had uniting them were a common ancestry and a common religion written in ancient Hebrew.

Jews are unique as being the only people who survived in these conditions. But once again, the uniqueness is not some arbitrary uniqueness. It is once again significant as very improbable thing. Ask any historian and they will tell you the conditions in which entire nations are subsumed by other nations, disperse, or integrate with the general stream of humanity. Mark Twain noticed this when he wrote an essay called Concerning the Jew (http://ohr.edu/judaism/concern/concerna.htm)

“The Egyptian, the Babylonian, and the Persian rose, filled the planet with sound and splendor, then faded to dream-stuff and passed away; the Greek and the Roman followed, and made a vast noise, and they are gone; other peoples have sprung up and held their torch high for a time, but it burned out, and they sit in twilight now, or have vanished. The Jew saw them all, beat them all, and is now what he always was, exhibiting no decadence, no infirmities of age, no weakening of his parts, no slowing of his energies, no dulling of his alert and aggressive mind. All things are mortal but the Jew; all other forces pass, but he remains. What is the secret of his immortality?” - Mark Twain

Jews, of course, are ready with the answer. In fact, the answer is right there in Deuteronomy: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+29&version=NIV and http://bible.cc/deuteronomy/4-27.htm . The amazing fact is, that not only is the dispersion into other nations predicted (Deuteronomy must have been written before the Babylonian exile, otherwise how would Jews in different parts of the world have exactly the same religion), but also the return to Israel! No nation that we know has ever achieved this. Why would Deuteronomy make such claims? The same claims are echoed over and over. God says that if the Jews don’t keep his commandments, they will be cast of Israel. But then he will return them into Israel. They will be eternally his people. Here are the powerful points:

1) God in the Bible says the Jews will always be around. Against all odds, this is correct 3000 years later!

2) Deuteronomy says they will get kicked out of their land, live among other nations, worship gods they have not known, and then after a very long time, God will hear their cry and they will come back to Israel. Not even Jewish zionists of the 19th century thought it would happen. They were happy to get land in Libya.

3) Was the writer of Deuteronomy just extremely ambitious with his unprecedented claims, and later got extremely lucky that Jews were the only people to whom this happened?

TAKEN TOGETHER

When I was using science to disprove stories in the Torah, I argued that a combination of independent results which come true is stronger than the results by themselves. So for example, if we Egyptian history said that there were pharaohs around in 2400 BC, it might be mistaken. Or if we carbon dated the mummies in the pyramids (or whatever) and they were around 2400 BC, then by itself our method might have given a wrong result. (It’s happened before. See http://www.science-frontiers.com/online/search.cgi?zoom_query=Carbon%20dating&zoom_per_page=50&zoom_and=1&zoom_sort=0 , and find the real scientific articles linked from there). Looking at the wax-like seals of the egyptian pharaohs might establish some sort of history. But taken TOGETHER, if they paint a coherent picture, it’s very hard to doubt them.

This is what caused me to really doubt Judaism. But look at it from the other side now.

Take just the two unbelievable phenomena I mentioned. The first is that Judaism alone claims to have started from a large number of ANCESTORS — in fact, ALL of them. Other religions all admit and record that they started with a few people who spread the ideas. Deuteronomy itself points this out and dares you to find another religion like that! It uses it as proof that God really did lead the Israelites out of Egypt, and reveal Himself on mount Sinai. The second claim of Deuteronomy is equally bold (for a human writer) and equally fantastic that it came true: the Jewish People will always be around, they will be few in number (not like Indians or Chinese), they will be dispersed among the nations, but will always be around, and eventually God will gather them back in Israel.

I should also mention that in their own book, God said the Jewish people were meant to be “a light unto the nations.” Mark Twain also remarks on the disproportionate amount of Jews who are intellectually affecting the world through science, art, philosophy, etc. and their disproportionate economic impact, in both business and philanthropy. But I will not really go into this because I think it may be related more to the Jews’ emphasis on intellectual study for hundreds of years. It may just be a cultural thing to promote intellectual excellence. But it is undisputed: the number of Jewish nobel prize laureates is far, far greater than would be expected if the number of Jews in the world is considered as a fraction of the world’s population. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_Nobel_laureates

Karl Popper, one of the greatest philosophers of science in the 20th century, came up with a theory of science is that is widely accepted today. It is based on the idea of Falsifiability. (His 1969 essay here: http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/popper_falsification.html ) . According to Popper, a theory is scientific insofar as it makes non-obvious, testable predictions. If they come true in the real world, the scientific theory gets more support. If they fail, the scientific theory needs to be re-evaluated, and revised if it has any chance of remaining correct.

Earlier I applied this principle to the claims of Judaism and Christianity, such as the flood, etc. And I have found lots of studies (history, radiometric dating, etc.) that seem to contradict the Biblical claims. These theories have been subjected to scientific scrutiny, and while the methods aren’t perfect, they have been shown to be quite reliable because they made non-obvious predictions that came true.

But now we have seen that the Torah makes amazing non-obvious predictions that have come true. And not just random predictions, but predictions that have a direct relationship to God, the Jewish People, and the story that God spoke to the Jews and through this experience their very religion, Judaism, started.

According to Karl Popper’s view or indeed any sort of rational and unbiased viewpoint, Judaism has a lot going for it. At the very least, Judaism and the Jewish People have some astounding and totally unique things about them, that attest to their truth, and that their book predicted beforehand. Maybe it’s just a giant coincidence. But that kind of thinking leads me to my conclusion:

CONCLUSION:

I have met many Jews who believe the world is literally less than 6,000 years old. When you sit with them and explain about all the geological processes, tree rings, and light from the stars, many of them have already heard some of these. And they say, “yes, the stars really are millions of light years of away, and yes we do see them. But this is because just like God created Adam to be 20 years old right away, He created the world to look as if it were old.” Indeed, here’s the interesting thing: the Talmud says this kind of stuff before we ever suspected the world was that old.

But what I hear when Jews say this is, “Fine. You have employed lots of different reasons and arguments. You have convinced me to a great extent that the world looks millions of years old. But… it’s not. It only looks that way!” This response happens not because someone is insane. On the contrary, it signals that they believe their OWN position so much, that they need a way to reconcile it with what you are telling them.

Similarly, I have started to see in atheists the same kind of dismissal of the various strong evidence that Judaism may be true. When I tell them about the Kuzari argument, they say “well, yeah it’s hard to explain how it came about, but there’s gotta be a natural explanation because this stuff never happened.” Once again, this is not because the atheist is insane. It is because he so firmly is educated to believe that nothing supernatural has ever happened, not even in the past, and “science” has so convinced him that he is willing to dismiss any evidence pointing the other way.

In essence both sides are engaging in a form of “I don’t care, your evidence must be wrong somehow, because my position is right.” They must engage with one another and work with each other to find out the truth!

I see this as very similar to special relativity and quantum dynamics. Both are amazing theories that predict amazing non-obvious things, and in their own domain, the evidence is very compelling. But when they enter each other’s turf — when relativity enters the micro domain, or when quantum mechanics is extended to the macro scale, they don’t work. They completely contradict each other in the other’s domain. Does this mean that a person doing special relativity should say “something’s just GOT to be wrong with the theory of Quantum Mechanics” and vice versa? Would he turn a blind eye to all the predictions quantum mechanics makes? If it works all the time, he would consult quantum mechanics researchers in those matters.

Thus it is with Judaism and Atheism. Both are very valid and self compelling world views on their own turf. Both have evidence for them. And proponents of both have a quick reaction to dismiss the “theories” of the other. Scientists have been working the better part of the 20th century, and until today, to find a “theory of everything” to reconcile the two.

One thing is exciting: if Judaism and scientific theories are both true, we may find out how they come together in the future!

January 6, 2011

How to live life well

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — admin @ 7:29 pm

Every person is motivated by two desires in life: to move towards pleasure, and away from pain. That is why many people spend considerable energy pursuing things they want, and avoiding things they think will cause them harm. But what determines pleasure and pain for us? Once we answer this, we will understand our own motivations better.

As living beings, we have various needs, ranging from the basic (necessity to breathe air) to the complex (feeling aligned with a greater purpose). When our needs are taken care of, we are content. If there would ever be a moment when all of our needs were taken care of and we were completely content, it would be easy to recognize things we merely want, rather than need — because the degree to which we don’t need them would be reflected in how content we are without them. However, it seems that such a moment hardly ever presents itself. There is always something to strive for, and some unfulfilled desire. What we can do, however, is approach the issue of what we need in stages.

As a starting place, let’s look at our most basic needs — like breathing air, and getting adequate nourishment. They concern our immediate survival, and since you are here reading this, you have probably been able to satisfy those needs to an adequate extent. How would you feel if these needs were ever threatened? What if you knew there was no more food tomorrow in your village? Realize that this is a real concern for many people around the world. If it isn’t a concern for you, then you are luckier than many people to have that kind of security. In this way, you can work our way up from the basic needs — to your own situation, and understand your unique individual desires. Consider the conditions holding true in your life, including the ones you may take for granted, and ask yourself, how important would it be to you if your expectations were seriously threatened? In this way, you can determine the importance of your own unique needs. As we grow and change, our needs change with us, and thus, we would have to re-evaluate what it takes to make us happy. We can do this periodically, or after major life events.

Having done this, we can prioritize our needs and distinguish conditions we really need to be true, from things we merely want to experience. Usually, we can clearly tell a need from a want by the fact that we can visualize the need as a clear condition you expect to be true, whereas the want is a more vague experience that you hope to have.

When we focus on our needs that are met securely and by a wide margin for error, we feel content. When we consider the many people who don’t have these needs met, we feel lucky. On the other hand, when we focus on something we want, but don’t have, we feel a desire to get it. This desire is our ambition — the opposite of contentment.

This is where many people make a mistake that leads to stress and unhappiness. They go after things that they want, before securing for themselves the things that they need more. As we will see later, being in a situation where the conditions you need to be in place are threatened, causes people to take unnecessary risks and make promises they would rather not keep. It makes them depend on others without a backup plan. Has this ever happened to you?

One of the best things you can do for yourself is to make sure your most important needs are secure, and know what risks are acceptable to you. People who already have everything they need (everything important to them, anyway) are in a great position to select among their options. You can spot a person like this because they treat every new opportunity as optional. They are usually more concerned with picking a good choice, and will often throw away perfectly good opportunities if they are not really convinced they should invest their resources.

In contrast, people who feel like they need something will often chase the best opportunities that present themselves at the time. Far from throwing away perfectly good opportunities, they are hoping to find at least one good opportunity and seize it. These two approaches are at opposite sides of the spectrum — one comes from a mindset of abundance, the other from a mindset of scarcity.

As we will explore, being content with what you have — being secure in your important needs — will actually help you get a better deal on what you want. And when we get a good deal on what we want, we feel happy.

Happiness, then, depends on our ability to accept what is really going on right now, and to first focus on the areas of our life where our needs are being met. The more basic our needs are, the simpler it is to take care of them. To know yourself in this way is to have control over your happiness.

December 5, 2009

Protected: Love and war of the sexes — part trois (hmm)

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 5:36 pm

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


November 28, 2009

Things guys should work on having

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 9:22 pm

The 12 things that can only make a guy more attractive. Feel free to comment on my list, but only add and remove things if you think they apply universally, not just to you.

1. being well dressed
they say clothes make the man. The clothes you buy should fit well, and stop short of having a style that screams “metrosexual”

2. having a car
especially one that feels awesome to get into. Bonus points for nice stereo system and comfortable seats. Make sure her leaning over doesn’t shift your gears :)

3. having enough money
you should be able to afford to take her out on a non-crappy date every single day without too much damage to your bank account. Not that you would, but you could — it’s a non-issue.

4. having a good social circle
people that really respect you, bonus points if it includes females in it. Oh, this is like he #1 thing that timid, intelligent guys need.

5. having your own place
bonus points if you have interesting things back there you can show her, or activities you could do together

6. having a style

be well groomed. Try going to a gay hair stylist. They might give you some good pointers. Something that fits with your actual personality, and doesn’t seem like a mishmash of frankenstein parts. Own your style, and have it together.

7. confidence and decisiveness
Confidence says you know you’ve got it going on, so focus on your good qualities. Also as a man, you should be able to be decisive, while at the same time having enough respect for social norms to not force people into awkward situations.

8. having an identity, a job
Be prepared to talk about what you do and a few things about how people you’re talking to might relate to it. How does it connect to who you are? Show, don’t talk, about what makes you unique and interesting.

9. working out and having a well built body
Women subconsciously ask, how is a man who can’t take care of himself going to take of me? Not to mention, a powerful man can make women feel weak in the knees :) This is especially true when she doesn’t know you well enough yet.

10. clean face, teeth, hair
It goes without saying, bad hygiene is a turn-off, although the standards vary a bit by culture. Use conditioner in your hair and try shaping it with paste. Some women like body hair on men, others don’t. If you’ve got a huge bush, try using a beard trimmer, to prevent itching as the hair grows back.

11. smell good, manly cologne
For the times one of you leans in to whisper sweet nothings in the ear of the other. Remember though, women on the whole have a more acute sense of smell than men do, so don’t put on so much that it’s overpowering. Consider getting a nice shower gel. And definitely use deodorant where needed.

12. be successful at something a woman can admire
There are so many things, I can’t even begin to list them. Okay, I can: cooking, photography, poetry, art, playing an instrument, etc.

September 19, 2009

Protected: Love and War of The Sexes, part deux

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 3:40 pm

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


July 1, 2009

Love and war of the sexes

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 1:27 pm

A lot has been written on the topic of human male-female relations. I should know — I read a lot of it. And having done enough of my own “research”, I think I’m qualified to present my findings. Let’s paint a picture of what’s really going on.

The two factors

It seems to me that most of the dynamics we observe in male-female relations stem from two main factors:

  1. Society’s restrictions on who we may meet, how many partners we may have, etc.
  2. Attraction triggers in men are much more universal than in women.

Let’s take a look at each of these. The wide-ranging effects of the first factor can be observed by looking at different societies, both throughout the world and throughout history. Some societies are very restrictive and essentially enforce courtship and marriage (sometimes arranged) as the only legitimate option. On the other extreme, we have free love movements, where people can freely express their sexuality without necessarily shutting off all other options for the rest of their life. The changes brought about in this country by the sexual revolution of the 1960s affect us all throughout America. Older ideas about chastity, properness, dating and marriage, are hardly as widespread as they once were.

The second factor polarizes male-female relationships, and leads to interesting phenomena depending on the society. It can be characterized like this: place a beautiful woman in 10 different situations, each with 10 different men, and they will all find her attractive. Place a man in 10 different situations, and in some he will come out attractive (such as when he is in a band or captain of the football team) to pretty much all women present, and in others he will be looked over by almost all women (such as when he’s in a starbucks getting coffee). Now, it is true: certain physical traits are attractive to most women … height, well developed musculature, and so forth. But on the whole, they do not dominate the other attraction triggers, as women’s looks do in men.

Women have long learned that looks are extremely important in attracting the opposite sex. I should clarify, though, a woman’s sex appeal is not just based on looks — as is commonly said — but also the implications such as being in shape, physicality, etc. … in short her sex appeal is universally tied to how physically satisfying the potential sexually charged activities would be with her. (This is what most men imagine.)

Men, on the other hand, may shine in some situations but not others, even sporting the same exact look and style. There are lots of nuances but the bottom line is this: traits that women consider attractive — whether they realize it or not — are almost always correlated with the man’s social circle and his status within it. For example, a man who is confident and uninhibited — let’s call him the “bad boy”. This man is attractive not only because he is more exciting, but there is a deeper implication: his social status among his friends is different from the men who are proper and try to fit in. Those men probably occupy average positions in social circles. The bad boy doesn’t try to please everybody, so those people who remain with him do so because they love to be around him. Thus, when a woman is out with him, she knows she is also surrounded by a social circle that gives him a lot of respect (which in evolutionary terms leads to better protection and resources, and in modern terms leads to more fun). We can see lots of similarities to this in nature, with the “alpha male” expressing himself without trying to fit in, etc. These traits may run counter to other qualities the woman is looking for — tenderness, responsibility — so her search is a more difficult one.

Consequences

Let’s start with some direct consequences of this situation. Because women’s beauty is a much more universal attraction trigger for men, it is polarizing. Women who are really beautiful, from the time they are teenagers, start realizing that men are always after them wherever they go. In societies where men can meet women freely, the majority of men are fixated on these women as their main choice whenever an opportunity arises. This leads beautiful women to believe they can get almost any man at any time.

Traditionally, women were to be sheltered and protected, and it was a man’s role to take risks and physical challenges. Nowadays, our society is very different and diverse, but these gender roles endure — even though they are outdated and sometimes wind up hurting both genders.

As an example, here is the typical way these historical ideas about gender roles hurt people today: it is commonly accepted that the man should make the first move and approach a woman. He should “ask her out” and possibly risk getting a polite “no”. Sounds fine, except let’s combine it with what we already learned about, above. The men will wind up asking out lots of beautiful women — because they are the ones the men are attracted to the most. The beautiful women are a small part of the overall population, and they are almost always seeing someone, because every time they go out they can meet men who’d like to date them — and some of those men do.

But there’s a dark side to all of this: many women are tired of constantly getting “hit on” by men everywhere they go.  Their responses are no longer polite — the man might come up all nice, and they’d give him a scathing look or ignore him altogether. That leads to the modern notion of beautiful girls “all being bitches”, or something similar. It’s true that their life is different and even their friends might be jealous of it. Some do become conceited or have high expectations (e.g. money to be lavished on them). They want to enjoy their time as much as they can, because their beauty is temporary (which is another factor). They are less willing to settle down than their plainer-looking counterparts, as can be readily seen in the studies.

Men’s experience is much more varied. Most men don’t have qualities that automatically draw women to them (such as fame and money, which can constantly put a man into situations where he appears attractive). So unlike beautiful women, it is up to them whether to engage with the opposite sex. On the average, men get approached much, much less often than women. So it’s up to them to choose how they will meet someone. Some men take the shot whenever they see a woman that they like — be it on the street, in a coffee shop, or in a bar. Almost all these men get rejections the majority of the time. And these are not your grandmother’s rejections. Looking at what we’ve established about modern male-female relations, we have the following:

  • free dating — meet pretty much anyone, no social pressure to make a long term commitment
  • this leads to lots of men asking the women they want out
  • social stigma from having too many partners (being “such a slut”, etc.)
  • this leads to women being as selective as possible, to protect their image
  • this, in turn, leads to more women being obnoxious to the random guys, because there are no consequences
  • this leads to nice guys getting tons of emotional abuse, and bad boys playing the field
  • finally, this means that these days the men who don’t have a problem with constantly chasing skirts, get most of the women. Because the others just get out of the game because rejections are too paintful, and settle down.

Social Dynamics

Women are social creatures. You’ll rarely see woman out at night by herself — she is either with friends or with a guy. Obviously, this is for protection, but it also developed a secondary function — social display. Women spend hours getting ready to go out for a reason.

We already spoke about how most of a man’s attractive qualities are tied to his social circle and his standing within it. It would do well for men to appear in groups, then. A solitary dude has a much lower chance of conveying his social circle status. Yet most men are pretty much “each man for himself” when they go out — completely the opposite of women. It’s true, they don’t need the “protection” that women seek, but they also significantly reduce their opportunities to display their social circle. At that point, their best bet is to show their social skills among the ad-hoc group that forms in the bar, or at the party. The man who masters this consistently becomes one of the most attractive men in the room.

Among animals, there is a behavior called lekking. This is where males put on competitive displays to attract females. Some women in today’s feminist-influenced society may talk badly about “macho behavior” or “guys always being so competitive”, but there is a counterpart in human society which attracts women despite anything they say. It is when a group of guys comes in and starts having competitive fun. Not only do they put on a loud display that everyone else in the room takes notice, but also the winners of the competition are seen as very attractive. This is an example of how social circles can help men be consistently seen as attractive.

to be continued…

March 16, 2009

Life is short?

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 5:45 pm

Many people say life is short. Compared to what? A dog lives, on average, a life that’s 7 times shorter. A fruit fly lives for a day.

Rather, life is limited. I’m writing because I realized something about that. Life is like a limited canvas in which you have the opportunity to create a masterpiece. What is your life about? It will be about whatever you choose to do during your life.

All those times we are complaining about how things are not the way we want them to be, how life is too short, etc. are times almost totally wasted. I used to say that worrying doesn’t ever help. But now I am going to say something deeper. You have a limited life, and there is a sublime beauty in that. You have limited resources, and it’s up to you to make something of it all. How do you go about it is up to you - it is your life.

Also a note about stress and multitasking. People say the years start flying by faster as you get older. I wouldn’t know for sure, of course, but I suspect that the rate at which time flies by has to do with memory and awareness. If you are constantly stressed out, multitasking, and feeling like you aren’t accomplishing very much, then life starts go by much more quickly. I know, because the last 4-5 years have gone by and I haven’t really traveled anywhere much, haven’t really “lived” all that much, while people around me, younger than me, have experienced so many adventures. If we focus on our health, our memory, our awareness of life, we may be better equipped to savor it. If we can accomplish things, and take our time to take it all in as we’re living our life, we may find much more fulfillment and satisfaction.

One more note about strengths and weaknesses. This post grew out of talking to my mother. She has accomplished quite a lot, and is ahead of others in many ways — for example, she finished a Ph. D in music in Russia, she has over 10 years of experience as a music teacher in public schools, she studied biology and physical therapy, and holds advanced degrees in education. But she took a couple real estate courses and is now filling up all her free time getting involved with properties she bought in Saratoga county. Meanwhile, she is not devoting a lot of time to utilizing her strengths. I look back on how I spent my own time, and I see a lot of time-wasting too, although to a lesser extent. So I want to make the following observation:

In those things that can really use our strengths, we can accomplish many things comfortably and effectively. Those are our resources — our education, our experience, our skills, the people we know, and so on. And they say the rich get richer . . . you have so much power in these areas, you can generate momentum much more easily, and later channel it to spill over into other areas.

Instead, we sometimes begin spending our time trying to start from scratch in an area we don’t have experience in, which we are still weak in. It could be fun if it’s just a hobby. But trying to make it in this area, without using any of your resources from the areas you are strong in, is almost always a waste of time in this limited life. It is frustrating. You wind up multitasking and stressed out. Your life begins to pass by more quickly and you don’t take it all in.

However, if you could build yourself up to success in the areas you’re good at, and then use your new resources to generate momentum in other areas, you will accomplish more and on the whole, you will be respected more too.

The big reason for this is that you have very few resources when you start out in a new area. Mark Twain said, “We are all stupid, just on different subjects.” If we learn effective ways of converting our resources (time, money, personality, skills, strengths, connections, etc.) into what we want, we’ll accomplish much more. When you are strong on something, and you play to your considerable strengths, you don’t have to worry about fixing all your weaknesses. But when you start out in a new field, you have to work on eliminating a huge number of weaknesses and naivete before you can get consistently good results. Because you have no overriding strengths to help you get away with your mistakes. For example, Paris Hilton recorded a CD. One thing is clear: use the resources you’ve got, and the ones you can convert more easily. Use your aces to get more aces. With these, you can later obtain 5’s or 6’s of another suit. Or something like that.

So sit down, write down a list of all your major resources, the ones that you have impressive amounts of. Then make a list of all the things you can accomplish with them. Some things you have never thought about accomplishing, and some you’ve been putting of. Perhaps it’s worth it to build a name for yourself. Maybe you can accomplish several of these, and then sit down and write your list anew. Have something to show others. Then you’ll have something to bring to the table when you’re venturing out into areas you need a lot of work in.

Good luck.

Selling air

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 1:11 am

Recently when Apple started selling it’s thinnest laptops, I joked that it had joined Adobe in selling the Air.

A while back I read about pyramid schemes and multi-level marketing. The first one is not legal in the US, but the second one is, in many states. The main difference is, in a multi-level scheme, you have to have an actual merchantable product to sell, the sale of which generates the money. The scalable money does not come from “membership fees”, as it does in pyramid schemes.

The interesting part comes when the product is electronic. These days, it costs almost nothing to replicate an electronic product and sell it, whether it is an e-book or a computer program. Imagine making an MLM scheme based on selling an electronic product. Anyone can have rights to redistribute copies of the product, but only if they pay commissions to the person who introduced them to the program. With physical products, the manufacture and supply chain would enforce this. But with electronic products, it is enforced by copyright law. I should look into mixing MLM with copyrighted electronic materials. It costs very little to carry out, and could really take off.

You don’t need to go very far, however, to make money in interesting ways. For example, there are lots of new species being discovered all over the world, theorems being proved, etc. And often they are named after the scientists that discovered them. Well, how about I make a company that lets millionaires give a unique gift… having a dinosaur named after you. Give us $500,000 and we’ll find you a scientist willing to take $250,000 to name the next dinosaur after your wife, and it’ll get its own wikipedia article, too. And we’ll send all the journals to you. We might even throw in a cuople other things, after all, we’re getting $250 G’s.

Kind of like all these companies bottling tap water and selling it . Brilliant. Although it might make sense to buy it if you suspect the pipes in your building are dirty. :)

March 8, 2009

8 Steps To Achieving Your Goals

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 2:10 am

I recently came up with a list I want to share with you. I wrote it when I sat down to think through the steps I will need to take in order to succeed at what I want. It assumes you don’t get any help from others (angel investors, rich uncles, get set up with a supermodel), but pull yourself up by your bootstraps until you are at a point where people and success naturally flow your way.

Okay, you must first have a goal, something you really want to bring about in your life. You have to want it badly enough to commit to achieving it. That can be called step 0.

Step 1

Identify what it will take to achieve your goal. Work past your fear, insecurities, shame, and any other psychological reasons that would hold you back. Commit yourself to a rational process: if you conclude you must do something, then work on getting rid of the obstacles and allow yourself to do it. (Maybe even enjoy the process of getting better at it.) Be ready to accept the consequences.

Step 2

Make a plan. Write down concrete milestones and deadlines. Then, double or even triple your deadlines to accomodate overhead (you will have to take care of other things too), and downtime (you might get sick, or sidetracked). The schedule may take longer than your exuberant optimism predicts, but the point is that you should be sure you can finish ahead of this schedule. You can have a good degree of certainty.

Now, fill in the space between the milestones with smaller tasks that you’ll have to complete, taking into account the dependencies some deliverables may have on others. Because you’ve stretched your deadlines out, this should present you with a pretty lenient minimum achievement curve. This is the curve you will have to outperform.

Step 3

You are probably in a relative stable position at the moment (unless you just lost your job in this current economy). Stay there, but start earning more and spending less. Save up enough money to buy yourself financial independence for as long as it takes to get your business running. Get access to resources that you will need to utilize once you start working on your project full-time. This step might take a long time, and you might be itching to start on your project execution. Use that energy to do well in your current work, and later on you will have a great shot at emerging successful with your project.

Yes, you can work on your project in your spare time, but you’ll have to juggle work, your project, your social and personal life, and meeting with other people about your project. Multitasking on this scale can cause a lot of stress and put various aspects of your life at risk, including your income and your commitments to others. I know this from personal experience, having worked late hours after coming home from work. My advice would be to do this only if you really think you can afford it.

Step 4

When you have saved up enough money to live on, you can leave your job. Do it as amicably and as cleanly as you can. If you and your employer part on good terms, you may be able to come back later on if your project doesn’t work out. At any rate, you’ll be able to rely on them to give you a good recommendation should you have to get another job in your industry. If you are a consultant and have clients, then tie up the loose ends as completely as possible. You don’t want your clients to be calling you two months down the line and distract you from working on your project. One thing you could do is put them in touch with a colleague of yours who is in the same business. Give them some of your accounts to maintain. They will appreciate the business. If things don’t work out down the line, they might return the favor and help you get started again by referring a couple clients of their own to you, or you might even get some of your old clients back. Or if you didn’t succeed, you might consider switching gears and getting a long term job.

Minimize your responsibilities as much as you can, but some may remain — for example, visiting your mother. Start meeting these responsibilities even better than before, since now you have more time. That way the people close to you will appreciate what you are doing and be more supportive.

Step 5

Begin executing the plan you’ve created. Pay particular attention to how you set things up in the beginning. This is probably going to be one of the most enjoyable times for you, anyway, since you are taking your first bold steps toward the future you want for yourself. You might be renting your first office, creating your first business cards, or getting the equipment together to build your first prototype. You’ll be setting up your workspace, decorating it, putting your personal touch on something other people will see later.

Keep a calendar and populate it with the minimum achievement schedule you’ve created. If you fall behind this schedule, you have to get on track as quickly as possible. On top of this schedule, mark down any new appointments that come up, such as following up with people you met, or going to new events. Since you are now all by yourself without a job, you will have a lot of overhead. Oh, and try not to get too sick — you probably don’t have health insurance at this point.

Step 6

Produce materials that you can show and tell others wen they get interested in what you’re doing. It is not enough to achieve something silently; there will be points when you will have to share with others what you do — on a dinner date, perhaps. So prepare in advance your shpiel about what you are passionate about, where you’re at today, and even better, have some marketing materials that explain to people (who may be unfamiliar with the technical details) the importance of what you are working on, and what you have already accomplished. Keep updating and refining these materials, and your story. If they are online, they are accessible from anywhere. If need be, hire a professional to help create these materials (e.g. call me for web design, hehe).

Step 7

Find out about opportunities in your area. Network and meet other people. Find out what they are doing and if you could help each other. Be interested in them, and be interesting yourself. If you have a lot going for you, and/or a lot of potential and enthusiasm, you will find people who naturally feel inclined to help you. People must feel good around you in order to help you, so be mindful of that. Make friends, and they may turn into partners.

Step 8

Finally, keep re-assessing where you are and where you need to be going. Life takes us in interesting directions. So often, people start thinking they are going to do something, and find themselves later on enjoying a totally different path. As we achieve, we learn, and we grow, and we change. Wherever we are, we are always headed somewhere so we might as well find our happiness along the way.

Older Posts »
image